Illegal Alien or Commander-in-Chief

Illegal Alien

NOT

Commander-in-Chief

Is Barack Hussein Obama an illegal alien or Commander-in-Chief is the question addressed specifically here. The following evidence will prove Obama is indeed an illegal alien and not a legitimate Commander-in-Chief—but a United States presidential usurper instead.

Barack Hussein Obama has no right whatsoever to be sitting with his treasonous feet upon the President's desk in the Oval Office.

Speaking with Mrs. Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email about Obama’s illegal alien status and ineligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief in a one-to-one interview, retired Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., claimed, “He wasn’t even eligible to be a U.S. Senator. He is actually an illegal, undocumented alien in the Oval Office, because his mother could not pass citizenship to him when he was born in Kenya; she was too young under the relevant U.S. laws at the time.

If you were born to a father who was a foreign national in a foreign country, the mother would have had to have been five years past the age of 14, which would have been 19, and she was only 18 when Obama was born. And, when Obama married Michelle, he could have obtained U.S. citizenship from her, but he didn’t file the necessary paperwork.”

In “Short Takes (Brief Clips of the News),” Jon Christian Ryter, a former newspaper reporter for a Parkersburg, West Virginia newspaper and currently employed by The Washington Times, explained in a little more detail why Barack Hussein Obama is an illegal alien—ineligible to President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief—as follows:

On March 26, 1790 the 1st Congress of the United States, session II, Ch.4 thought it necessary to define precisely what an Article II citizen was to prevent those not legally defined as an Article II citizen from running for, or winning the office of, President of the United States since as a non-citizen, they are not eligible to do either. In the records of the 1st Congress, second session, Congress enacted the guidelines which determined that people not born here while what became the United States was under the thumb of England, who applied for, and were granted citizenship rights, would be construed as a “naturalized” citizens as would any children with them who were under the age of 21 years. These children may have been born in this country, but because their parents were not natural born they were also deemed to be naturalized, not natural born, citizens. They had voting rights, and the right to run for Congress, but not the office of President.

I would like you to pause for a moment and think about the pregnant illegals that steal into the United States specifically to have anchor babies here. In the mid-1930s, social progressive Franklin D. Roosevelt decreed, by Presidential Proclamation, that they are construed to be natural born, allowing their parents to use their “anchor status” to get green cards which allowed them to stay in the country. The most prominent illegal in this country today has two anchor children, and a natural born anchor wife. His name is Barack Obama. If his name sounds familiar it's because he's the illegal alien who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania in Washington, DC.

According to the law enacted by the 1st Congress, session II, Ch. 4, whether he was born in the State of Hawaii or not, he is ineligible to run for, or be elected to, the office of President of the United States because the law stated: “...the children of citizens (both parents) of the United States, shall be considered natural born citizens; provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any State, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of that State in which such a person was proscribed. (a) Approved, March 26, 1790.” What does that mean? It means the father must be a be a citizen to transmit citizenship to a child of his seed who was born in this country. If he is a natural born citizen, he will transmit that right to his offspring. If he is a naturalized citizen, he transmits that right. He cannot transmit a right he does not possess. Thus, if he is not a citizen of the United States, he cannot transmit citizenship rights of any type to his offspring since he has none to bequeath. Which means any illegal alien cannot transmit US citizenship rights to an illegal offspring since they lack citizenship. The parents, and their US-born offspring are legally subject to deportation.

Barack Hussein Obama's father was born in Kenya and was never a citizen of the United States, thus he could not transmit citizenship rights to his son—except Kenyan citizenship rights. Which he did. England claims Barack Obama is a citizen of Kenya. He is also a citizen of Indonesia since his step father, Lolo Soetero, who legally changed Obama's name to Barry Soetoro, renounced both any claim Obama had to US citizenship through his mother, or Kenyan citizenship through his father.

Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport which suggests the international community viewed him not as an American but an Indonesian. As did Occidental College which, it now appears, gave him a foreign exchange student scholarship.

While Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, was a naturalized citizen, under federal law she would have had to be 19-years of age when she gave birth to be able to transmit citizenship rights to a foreign-born son. She was 18-years, 8-months and 5-days old when her son was born on August 4, 1961.

Because his father was not a natural citizen of the United States he could only transmit the type of citizenship he possessed. Since he was not a US citizen, he could not even transmit naturalized citizen status. And, since his mother was 3-months and 25-days shy of being able to transmit natural birth status to her first born son, any legal status is in question even if Obama was born in Hawaii—which the effort, and money being spent by Obama to conceal his birth records, together with statements by Kenyan Minister of Lands, James Orengo and Kenyan Minister Bonny Khalwale who claim Obama is native born in Kenya, suggests that the only actual, legitimate long form, birth doctor-affirmed birth certificate Obama has is Kenyan. And thus, even though US law was changed in 1986, he would at least have had a citizenship argument even though he could still not have gotten around the lack of standing of his father to qualify as a natural born citizen. The law was further diluted in 1994, 33 years after his birth. But, once again, too little, too late.

Many claims have been made that Obama has a legitmate Hawaiian birth certificate, like the one posted above (minus my red-lettered entries) on the Internet, which is obviously a computer-generated forgery for too many reasons to list here. Below we see a legitimate Hawaiian Certificate of Live birth for Congressional Candidate Miki Booth's son—NOT the forged Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth above that Robert Gibbs claims he placed on the Internet as Obama's “real birth certificte.”

In a YouTube video cut of his press briefing on June 11th, 2010, Gibbs discussed the Obama birth certificate issue, after being asked about Obama's strange Connecticut social security number.

After evading an answer to the social security number question, the White House press secretary claimed, “I’ve seen the real birth certificate, I put it on the Internet.” If so, then it seems Gibbs is liable for fraud, and I believe Tim Adams would adamantly disagree with him—at least in regard to its legitimacy.

“There is no birth certificate,” said Tim Adams, a graduate assistant who teaches English at in Bowling Green, Ky. “It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this.” “The former Honolulu elections clerk who says President Obama was ‘definitely’ not born in Hawaii and has no birth certificate from any hospital in the Aloha State says he's willing to testify in court to those facts,” reported WorldNetDaily. Adams stressed: “In my professional opinion, he definitely was not born in Hawaii. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii because there is no legal record of him being born there.”

Evidence like this has caused officers in the US military—like Major Cook, Commander Fitzpatrick, and Lt. Colonel Lakin—to question whether Barack Hussein Obama is a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, according to the US Constitution, and whether they are obeying legitimately issued orders.

Article II, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution clearly states: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”

This is the oath that all commissioned officers take:

I, _____ , having been appointed an officer in the (Service) of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God. (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Any U.S. military officer has a sworn obligation to uphold and defend what the Constitution plainly states, and is obligated to disobey any suspected unlawful orders from any Commander-in-Chief that won't prove his legitimacy by providing a certified copy of his birth certificate.

Obama has not done so, and Lt. Colonel Lakin is the most recent officer to challenge him to verify his assumed status as Commander-in-Chief by asking him for his credentials in the letter below:

His court-martial, be it valid or not, is scheduled for this fall.

In a long Post & Email interview of June 16, 2010 with General Paul E. Vallely, Sharon Rondeau asked him: “In regard to Lt. Col. Lakin’s court martial, do you think he will finally be allowed full discovery? Is the court martial even legitimate if Obama is not a legitimate commander-in-chief?

GEN. VALLELY: That’s a great question. Some parties, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, would say ‘No, it’s not legal.’ I think the fix is on and the administration has threatened anybody in the Department of Defense who pushes for discovery with removal. It’s a typical Chicago ploy: ‘We’re going to silence you,’ and I think that’s what’s going on. With the Article 32, the woman judge came out ahead of time and said, ‘We will not allow any discovery which the defense is going to present.’ They made that decision, so you know from that point, the fix was on.

MRS. RONDEAU: Do you think that’s why Lt. Col. Lakin waived the Article 32?

GEN. VALLELY: I know it is.

MRS. RONDEAU: So is he figuring that going right to the court martial is the best way to get an answer?

GEN. VALLELY: Yes, but the fix will be on such that they’re not going to allow any discovery. They’ll do everything to cover up some eight of the ten records that have not been released by Obama such as school records, and even his name change.

MRS. RONDEAU: If they will not allow discovery even for the court martial, what do you think will happen?

GEN. VALLELY: Well, I think the word then will be reinforced that it’s a corrupt administration. They will do anything to silence the truth; they will do anything to keep this man in office, even though he’s totally incompetent to hold office. That’s going to happen. So again, the people have to take the country back, so they have to understand that.